Skip to main content

Aquino’s tirade against Bongbong is unreasonable

By Alfredo C. Garvida Jr.
Contributor

President Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III took the occasion of the 30th anniversary commemoration of EDSA to lambast survey-leading vice presidential aspirant, Sen. Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr., for the oft-repeated "excesses" of his father's martial law regime, which the senator has steadfastly refused to apologize for in response to their political enemies' self-serving demand for Bongbong to do so in this year's political campaign.

The issue about President Marcos' martial law has been debated on for the past 30 years, with yet no substantive, clear-cut judgment by history if the late dictator's ouster from power did more good than bad for the Filipino people. The debate continues to rage on in the face of the Marcos family's return to the political mainstream, heightened, it now appears, by the looming threat that the late strongman's only son could become the nation's vice president for the next six years—and president thereafter. 

Mr. Aquino argues that Mr. Marcos does not deserve to be elected to the vice presidency because of his father's martial law regime. Which is analogous to Noynoy Aquino, now better known as PNoy, should have not been elected as president because of his mother’s miserable performance in her presidency, or his father's suspected, but unsubstantiated, dalliance with the communists during the glory days of his political life. 

There are similarities in Bongbong's and PNoy's cases. One of which is that they are both the children of presidents. Another is that they are being imposed with inheriting the legacy of their parents. The unhealthy difference, however, lies in the fact the while the pro-Aquino pundits want Bongbong to inherit only the bad side of his father's legacy, the only side they want for PNoy to inherit from his parents were the good part of their legacies, namely, their being treated as the icons of liberty. 

There is no doubt in this writer's mind that people were robbed of their freedom during the martial law years; that there were abuses committed by the military. Yet to some historians, the nation was under a revolutionary state: a self-revolution imposed by the nation's leader to reform society and raise the people's being to a higher level. That it was necessary therefore to use strong-armed policies to get people back to the fundamentals of discipline and righteous living. The martial law enforcers—the military, that is—were not wholesome in their enforcement of the military law, however, that some went beyond the bounds of their mandate, which resulted thus to tortures, disappearances and undue enrichment on themselves. But things like these occur under a revolutionary regime, some historians say—without condoning the beastly acts of the abusive military personnel however. 

It would be foolish to think that Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr., who was only 15 years old when his father imposed martial law on the land, and 28 when it ended, had a hand in the torture and disappearance of people. This writer may attest that he did not have a hand in the alleged plunder committed by people in his father's government, lest he would have lived the life of a pauper in Los Angeles California, where he temporarily resided during his family's banishment from the country. I can attest to this because I have had the occasion of personally contributing $10 to an emergency fund instantaneously set up by his sympathizers for his routine activities while in L.A. I also remember him driving alone from San Francisco to Los Angeles on a not-so-much road worthy car just to get in time for a speaking engagement in L.A. I also remember that on instructions of now Party-List Congressman Jonathan Dela Cruz, I had to book him at the Sheraton Hotel in LA during that occasion on the least expensive room available which the congressman personally paid for. 

It is therefore my personal assessment now that Bongbong would have not suffered that humiliating life in LA if he had the money, which substantiates my assertion that the senator did not have a hand in the well-trumpeted plunder allegedly committed by the martial law people, including his family. 

The military abuses and plunder, Bongbong did not have a hand on, why must he be made to answer for them now? If President Marcos was a bad president, as his critics are saying and therefore, his son should be punished for it, why must PNoy be exempted from being criticized for his mother's bad presidency likewise? The candidate Marcos should be judged by the electors not on what he did not do but rather on what he has done. The jury is yet out as to what the senator has accomplished in his long years of public service, but certainly absence of his involvement in the martial law affairs, the only yardstick to gauge his election must be what he has done, and plans to do for the Filipino people if he gets elected again to a public office.


This writer has not made up his mind as to who will be the recipient of his vice presidential vote given the fine lines contained in all the vice presidential candidates' respective resumes. Robredo, Escudero, Cayetano, Honasan and Trillanes, Bongbong's rivals for the vice presidency, are all impeccably decent and intelligent people deserving of the office they are running for. That Bongbong is my provincemate does not automatically guarantee my vote for him. But Aquino's constant reference of EDSA, and apportioning some blame to Bongbong—even in the face of certain historians' and writers' thinking that EDSA was a failed revolution—as the battle cry of the Liberal Party's objective to retain power in government holds no water in the court of reason. Therefore, if only to register my protest to President Aquino's illegitimate reasoning, I may vote for Bongbong after all. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empanada festival: A celebration of good taste and good life

By Dominic B. dela Cruz & Leilanie G. Adriano Staff reporters BATAC CITY—If there is one thing Batac is truly proud of, it would be its famous empanada-making business that has nurtured its people over the years. Embracing a century-old culture and culinary tradition, Batac’s empanada claims to be the best and tastiest in the country with its distinctive Ilokano taste courtesy of its local ingredients: fresh grated papaya, mongo, chopped longganisa, and egg. The crispy orange wrapper and is made of rice flour that is deep-fried. The celebration of this city’s famous traditional fast food attracting locals and tourists elsewhere comes with the City Charter Day of Batac every 23 rd  of June. Every year, the City Government of Batac led by Mayor Jeffrey Jubal Nalupta commemorate the city’s charter day celebration to further promote its famous One-Town, One Product, the Batac empanada. Empanada City The Batac empanada festival has already become an annua

PIDS expert says income tax cuts justified; warns gov’t of revenue loss

Proposals to amend the personal income tax schedule appear to be well-justified. However, these proposals should include measures that will allow government to recover the revenue loss from lower income taxes. Dr. Rosario Manasan, senior research fellow of state think-tank Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), said at a seminar sponsored by the Philippine Senate, that government should look for new revenue measures to compensate for the projected revenue loss that will arise as a result of the implementation of any of the various proposals to restructure the personal income tax. Currently, there are several income tax reform proposals pending in both houses of Congress. All of them, according to Dr. Manasan, have the same objective of addressing the phenomenon of bracket creep, which results from “non-indexation to inflation of personal income tax brackets”. Simply put, bracket creep occurs when employees’ income increases over time as a result of inflation. Th

PGIN honors Ilocano heroes of past, present through Heroes Walk

SPO1 Allan Lampitoc Franco of Banna, Ilocos Norte and PO2 Jovalyn D. Lozano of Adams, Ilocos Norte receive a resolution of commendation, a certificate of college scholarship grant to their family members and a P20,000 cash incentive each from the Provincial Government of Ilocos Norte represented by Governor Imee R. Marcos and Vice Governor Angelo M. Barba in recognition of their bravery and heroic acts in the Mamasapano clash in Maguindanao on January 25. Mr. Franco and Mr. Lozano were recognized on March 10 in time for the unveiling of the second batch of Ilocano heroes at the Heroes Walk located along the Sirib Mile in Laoag City.  (Lei Adriano) By Jennifer T. Pambid PGIN-CMO In honor of the heroes who brought freedom, fame and glory to the province as well as to the country in the past century, the Provincial Government of Ilocos Norte (PGIN) through the Education Department and Sirib Youth Office launched the second batch of Ilocano Heroes Walk on March 10, 2015.